One of the most significant advancements in women’s health is the birth control pill, also known as an oral contraceptive or simply “The Pill.” Since there was no reliable method of preventing conception before the introduction of the Pill, many women were compelled to endure multiple pregnancies.
Because their bodies were either too weak or too exhausted to carry another child to term or because they gave birth to malformed children, some women passed away during childbirth.
Margaret Sanger, then nineteen years old, became a nurse and advocated for the development of contraceptives for women after her mother passed away while giving birth to her eleventh sibling. Katherine McCormick, the wealthy widow of an inventor who financed the research that led to the development of the birth control pill, later proved to be an ally for her.
Gregory Pincus, a doctor, and researcher from the United States discovered that steroidal hormones and hormonal biology played a role in rabbit conception. Pincus approached the pharmaceutical company Searle for assistance in developing the birth control pill with financial support from McCormick and Sanger.
Despite Searle’s initial decline, which was largely caused by the strict birth control laws of the time, the pharmaceutical company was eventually able to produce the first oral contraceptive for women thanks to an accidental discovery made by one of his scientists and Pincus’ research.
The first birth control pill, Enovid, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States in 1960. Later, it was discovered that Enovid had terrible side effects, primarily because the dosage at the time was about ten times higher than what was required.
Women can now choose from a variety of contraceptive medications and devices to prevent unwanted pregnancies thanks to ongoing research and development. This is a long way from the oppressive laws that were in place from 1873 until 1965 when the Comstock laws made it illegal to use contraception.
The distinction between what is permissive and what may be immoral is constantly being questioned and frequently becomes the subject of heated debate as society becomes increasingly open and permissive regarding sexual matters.
There is currently one such moral debate going on. A choice made by authorities from Ruler Center School in Portland, Maine has ignited a public discussion in the US. The contention originates from their determination to offer a full scope of contraception, including conception prevention pills, to understudies matured from eleven to fifteen having a place with grades six to eight. Students in this age group now have access to a wider variety of contraceptives than before, when they only had access to condoms from the neighborhood sexual health clinics.
The students will now be able to get prescriptions for birth control pills and other forms of contraception without their parents knowing, even though they will need parental consent to use the city-run health care clinic. This follows a request from the school’s health center to make the pills available to middle school-aged high school students.
However, many dissents that these kids are essentially excessively youthful to have free admittance to such types of contraception, and dread that this will lead kids to imagine that engaging in sexual relations early on is right.
However, proponents of the decision point to the rising number of teenage mothers in the United States and say that they would rather give children these options than witness a twelve-year-old becoming pregnant. One national study found that girls under the age of 14 had more than 17,000 pregnancies.
In addition, advocates assert, extensive counseling will be provided to the children before the administration of the medication. The goal of providing birth control to this age group is not to encourage promiscuity but rather to keep students safe and in school. In a time when they are constantly exposed to sexually suggestive images, many children who do not have a strong parental advocate need someone they can turn to and trust to answer questions about their sexuality.
Eventually, whether one is possibly in support of the plan, it means a lot to find some kind of harmony between resolving the developing issue of young pregnancies and physically communicated sicknesses and maintaining an ethical norm for all understudies. People need to realize how important it is for parents and other members of the family to teach children about sex and its consequences of it.
